Is there a direct cost to the contractor when being processed for a facility security clearance?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the Anti-Terrorism Officer Level II Training Test. Challenge yourself with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with helpful hints and explanations. Get exam-ready now!

The correct response indicates that there is no direct cost to the contractor when being processed for a facility security clearance. This is based on the understanding that the government typically bears the costs associated with the clearance process, including the expenses for background investigations and other administrative procedures.

While contractors may incur indirect costs due to the time and resources spent managing the clearance process or redesigning workflows to accommodate security requirements, these are not considered direct costs of obtaining the security clearance itself. Therefore, stating that there is no direct cost accurately reflects the policy and procedural framework surrounding security clearances for contractors. This ensures that the financial burden remains on the government rather than on the contractors, encouraging participation and compliance with necessary security measures.